Author Archives: suzeveringham
In this study we will investigate variation in invertebrate and plant community characteristics along environmental gradients (e.g. climate, soil fertility). If the implementation of an experiment in your area requires too much of a commitment it is possible to only participate in the observational part. If you are able to set up the experiment (see below) the baseline data that you collect will be used for the comparative study, so everyone participating in the experimental part will automatically be included in the comparative part. The comparative study will focus initially on a climatic gradient within Europe, and we will expand the analysis to a global comparison later.
1.1. Selection of sites
You should assess the plant and invertebrate communities in at least two herbaceous communities. However, if you participate in the experimental study, then only the baseline data of one site is required. The climatic conditions should be similar between the two plant communities, but they should differ in their plant functional composition, for instance due to variation in soil conditions, to disentangle the direct (climate) and indirect (plant characteristics) drivers of changes in the invertebrate community. Additionally, we would like to include altitudinal gradients in addition to the latitudinal gradients, in order to avoid a complete confounding of latitude and climate. We therefore welcome survey of sites along altitudinal gradients. Each site should be relatively homogeneous, dominated by herbaceous or shrub vegetation. Natural disturbances, such as fire or browsing by vertebrates, do not need to be excluded from the site, but a record of the disturbance regime, and ideally a quantification of vertebrate herbivory, is required. It is preferable that the site is not heavily grazed by livestock. Grazed sites can be included if the plots are fenced, though. The sites should be visited at peak biomass production (the timing of peak biomass will vary between sites and will be defined by local researchers for their system).
At each site, select ten 1m x 1mplots. Plots should be randomly distributed across the site and should be at least 3m apart from each other. To randomly select plots, you can throw a stick.
1.2. Measurements per site
Sampling of the aboveground invertebrate community
To test whether there are large scale patterns in invertebrate community characteristics, the invertebrate community of a site will be characterized using suction sampling. It is preferable to do this at the very beginning of your sampling, as invertebrates may move away when you are working on the plots.
Next to seven of the ten 1m2 plots, you should cover an area of 0.16 m2 of vegetation in the middle of the plot with a cylindrical, fine-meshed gauze-cage of 45 cm diameter (Ikea laundry basket, see detailed protocol) to prevent insects from escaping. You will sample invertebrates within the cage following a standardized protocol with a leaf blower set to suction mode (Stihl SH86), equipped with a gauze-bag inserted into the suction tube. Transfer the samples to plastic containers filled with 70% ethanol. If possible, sort the invertebrates into major groups (orders, see detailed protocol), count them and classify them as herbivores or predators if possible (this will be difficult for several groups such as Heteroptera, Diptera and Coleoptera), and send them to the project coordinators for further measurements. If you will not be able to sort and classify the samples, this will be done by the project coordinators. We will provide detailed protocols on how to sample invertebrates, as well as ideas on where to find leaf blowers to borrow.
Plant species composition
Estimate the percent plant cover per plant species in each of the ten 1m x 1mplots. Cover for each plant species rooted within the plot will be estimated to the nearest 1% (up to 20% cover) and the nearest 5% for cover 20-100%. Estimate also the percent cover for woody over storey, litter, bare soil, and rocks if present. Total cover will typically exceed 100% because species cover is estimated independently for each species (see cover datasheet). To reduce bias in cover assessment, it is helpful to train yourself by placing differently sized pieces of paper on the plot: e.g. 10cm x 30cm = 3 %, 10cm x 10cm = 1 %, 3.1cm x 3.2cm = 0.1%, 31cm x 32cm = 10 % …
Herbivore damage and fungal infection
To assess herbivore damage and pathogen infection per site, you will score damage and infection in each of the 10 plots. Assess herbivore and pathogen damage species-wise.
Selection of species: Start with the species having the highest cover, followed by the species with the second highest cover, and so on, until the cover-sum of the species reaches 80% (relative cover excluding bare ground, rocks). However, do not assess damage on more than five plant species per plot. E.g. if Species A has a cover of 50%, Species B a cover of 20%, Species C a cover of 10% and Species D a cover of 8% assess damage on A, B and C. If Species A has already a cover of 90%, then only assess cover on species A. If Species A, B, C, D, and E have each a cover of 15% and species F, G, H, I… a cover of 5% then only assess damage on the five most abundant species (A,B,C,D and E) although the sum of their cover does not add up to 80%.
Selection of individuals per species: If your species has less than 10 individuals, select all individuals. If your species has between 10 and 20 individuals per plot, mark all individuals in the 1m2 with grill sticks numbered from 1-20. We will provide you with a list of random numbers between 1-20, alternatively you can use a random number generator to select 10 individuals. If your species has more than 20 individuals, divide your 1m2 plot into four quadrants, and estimate the proportion of individuals in each of the four quadrants. Randomly select individuals per quadrant in proportion to their numbers of individuals, e.g., if quadrant 1 contains 80% of all individuals, and quadrant 3 20%, then randomly select eight individuals of quadrant 1 and two of quadrant 3. Particularly if the distribution of your species is very patchy (e.g. one large patch with many individuals, and 3 isolated individuals) this methods prevents that you will select isolated individuals with a higher likelihood (see Fig. 1).
Measurements: On each of the selected individuals per species (max. of 10), record the presence or absence (0,1) of damage signs by chewing, mining, galling and sucking/rasping herbivores, and pathogen disease symptoms of the categories downy mildews, powdery mildews, rusts and leaf spots (see damage gallery). This will give us an estimation of damage incidence. In addition, pick five of the individuals (select them using the grill sticks with the first five random numbers from your random-number list), measure their maximal height (stretch out if necessary, see plant traits below) and cut them at ground level. If your individual is very large, or builds large tussocks as is often the case for grasses, then take a subsample from the middle of the individual which contains at least five leaves. Bag the plants individually in labelled plastic bags and place them in a cooler. If you selected only one plant species per plot because this species had a relative cover of 80% or more, then cut all 10 individuals. Back in the lab, visually survey five random, mature, and non-senescing leaves for damage and disease symptoms. For easier inspection you can use hand lenses to better assign damage types. On each of the five leaves estimate the leaf area (%) that has been removed by chewing herbivores, mining, galling and sucking/rasping herbivores, and the leaf area that is covered by pathogenic disease symptoms of the categories downy mildews, powdery mildews, rusts and leaf spots. Some plant individuals will have fewer than 5 leaves, and for these all leaves should be surveyed (but leave out senescent leaves). Note that in some cases, damage is present on only the underside of leaves, so remember to check both sides of the leaf for damage. We will provide a training set of digital leaves to estimate and improve precision and bias, and a photo gallery of the most common damage types. With this method you will have a minimum of 10 bagged individuals (if one species had a cover of 80% or more) or up to 25 bagged individuals (if you selected 5 plant species with each 5 individuals) per plot. If you prefer, you can also do the % damage estimation in the field – you would then still need to bag the plants, as these individuals will also be used to measure several plant traits (make sure to have 5 healthy leaves from each individual, see below).
If you work in shrublands, you may not find 10 individuals of a species in your 1m2 plot but very likely will have only one or two individuals. In this case, randomly pick 50 leaves from 10 different branches (5 leaves per branch), and try to always chose leaves from the same position (e.g. the 5th position on a branch). Assess how many of those 50 leaves are damage. This allows us to assess the proportion of leaves that are damaged by the different damage categories per individual (incidence). Also, assess the height of these individuals. In addition, assess the % leaf area damaged on at least 25 randomly chosen leaves per species, e.g. if you have two individuals of a species in one plot, assess the % damage on 12-13 leaves of each of these individuals. You can assess % damage either in the field or collect the leaves to assess damage in the lab. In any case you should collect a few leaves to measure several plant traits, however these leaves should not contain any damage symptoms.
At each site, several plant traits – plant height, specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC) – will be measured to characterize the plant communities. These traits are closely associated to two major axis of plant functional variation, the size of plants and their parts, and the resource economics spectrum (Wright et al. 2004, Díaz et al. 2016). You will measure the traits according to protocols in Garnier et al. 2001. The traits will be measured on the same individuals that you have selected for the assessment of % herbivore and pathogen damage. The height will be measured directly in the field (see section on herbivore and pathogen damage), SLA and LDMC will be measured on the individuals (or subsets of the individuals) that you have collected in the field (see protocols on how to measure SLA and LDMC).
To quantify site productivity, adjacent to each of the ten 1m x 1mplots clip the aboveground plant material to 2 cm above ground level, in two 10cm x 50cm strips (Fig. 2). Collect the total aboveground biomass, dry it for 3 days at 70 °C and weigh it. Send a subsample of the dry biomass samples to the project coordinators. If you can grind the biomass to powder, that would be ideal, but if not you can cut the biomass sample in pieces and send us a well-mixed subsample. Please send us at least 20 g of dry weight per plot (e.g. in a zip-block plastic bag or a jar, see labelling protocol). We will use the samples to measure several leaf characteristics (leaf N and P, fibre content etc.) and to identify the phyllosphere microbiome.
If you work in shrublands, you should use allometric equations developed for your species of interest, which are usually based on percentage cover and height, or variables such as diameter (see e.g. Gonzalez et al. 2013). We will develop a protocol for the assessment of shrub biomass very soon.
Soil cores will be collected to assess a range of soil characteristics. In each of the ten plots, collect two soil cores (soil corer 2.5 x 10 cm) and homogenize the soil into a single sample per site. Please sieve the soil through a 2 mm mesh. Soils should be air-dried and send to the project coordinators (see labelling and mailing protocol sheet for more details). There, total organic C, total N and P stocks, as well as mineral N (ammonium, nitrate) and P will be measured.
1.3. Optional measurements per site
Herbivore and pathogen damage on locally rare plant species
In addition to the assessment of herbivore and pathogen damage on the most common plant species, which contribute to 80% of the relative plant cover, we will also assess the damage on the five locally most rare species per plot. This allows us to test whether locally abundant plant species usually receive more damage than locally rare ones (host concentration or dilution effect), or whether locally rare species receive more damage than locally common ones (reverse Janzen-Connell effect). To do so, start with the least abundant plant species, select 10 individuals for the assessment of damage incidence, and 5 individuals for the assessment of % leaf damage, as described above. Do the same for the second, third, fourth and fifth rarest species in the plot. You will very likely have less than 10, respectively five individuals per species. If you have sampled less than 10 individual after the fifth species, select a sixth or seventh species until you reach 10 individuals.
Sampling of molluscs and belowground invertebrates
Assess mollusc abundance by placing a pit-fall trap baited with beer (Heineken- not because it is good but because it should be available all around the globe) next to each of five randomly chosen plots. Leave the beer-traps out for five days, but check them every two days and remove molluscs. Count the molluscs, dry and weigh them.
Pollinator assessment using pan traps
To characterise the pollinator community at a site, coloured pan trapping is considered a simple, efficient method. We will provide a standard protocol to collect flying insects at a site.
Bird predation rate assessment using plasticine caterpillars
Fake caterpillars using plasticine is a standard method to assess predation rates by birds, rodents, or arthropods. We will provide a standard protocol for the assessment of predation rate using plasticine caterpillars.